Showing posts with label Halliburton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Halliburton. Show all posts

Friday, October 21, 2011

With All Due Respect to Bernard Baruch

I know enough to know that when someone starts a sentence with the words "In all due respect...," there's no great love coming forward. You know the tone. The same one that's used right before you hear something like "in my humble opinion."

I tend not to use profanity, except when paying for sex, but when I hear either of those sets of words, my first response is "F**k you, will all due respect."

Sometimes, I may instead say "In my humble opinion, you can go and F**k yourself."

And then I stop listening to whatever it is that's about to be uttered, but I amuse myself with an internal giggle at their expense.

Many years ago, when I was first getting started in life and the greater world of investments, I was very fortunate to have received a cold call from a young man named Bob Shapiro.

To make a long story short, Bob was just starting out with E.F. Hutton, of E.F. Hutton fame and became my stock broker for the next 25 years.

How often have you known a cold call to work out?

I followed him to Smith Barney and then to UBS and to all of the corporate in-betweens and iterations after E.F. Hutton gave up its soul and life.

Sadly, Bob passed away about 4 years ago.

Bernard BaruchAlthough I told him that I had, I never did read any of the writings of Bernard Baruch. Bob had recommended that I do so.

If you read my blog on a regular basis, you'll know by the persistent presence of typos, I don't even read my own blog, much less the writings of a long dead legendary investor, whose mere mention of his name causes phlegm filled sputum to be hurled outward.

It's bad enough that there's an entire summer's worth of swatted flies on my computer monitor, I don't need any Baruch related detritus.

I'll never know whether Baruch had the same penchant for run-on sentences as I seem to have.

Anyway, Bob was a fan and being a man of structure and integrity, he ascribed to at least one one of Baruch's investing principles. That was to cut your losses once you've reached the 10% mark.

Bob practiced what he preached. He was consistent in his application of the rules and he was a good shepherd of my portfolio, using his discretion to trade.

Sometimes performance disappointed, but Bob never did.

In the intervening years, I still haven't read Baruch's works, but I've adopted Bob's belief in rules.

The only thing is that I don't buy into Baruch's "10% Rule."

For starters, I hate to take a loss, unless its being done for tax purposes.

Sometimes, though, I'll admit that I used "taxes" as an excuse to just get rid of a loser or what I think to be "dead money."  Invariably, those have been technology stocks. Other than Google, VMWare, Riverbed Technology, Apple and Microsoft, I've not had good luck with technology.

Actually, when I lay it out like that, the technology winners outnumber the losers. Dell, Hewlett-Packard and Research in Motion are my losers, but I hold grudges for a long time and human nature makes it easier to remember the dregs.

Part of the reason that I hate to take losses is that during my years with Bob, I saw many stocks recover from that 10% drop and often quite quickly. Beyond that, there were certainly many holdings that might have had paper losses approaching 10%, yet went on to recover and profit. Rio Tinto, a holding that I've had since 1994 was one such example.

In the meantime, though, I've had plenty of stocks that have had losses in excess of 10% but I've nursed them back to health.

Riverbed Technology is one example, but the most recent is Transocean, one of the bad boys of last year's Gulf Oil spill.

I own shares of British Petroleum, Halliburton and Transocean and I refer to them as my Evil Troika, yet I welcome them to my portfoklio.

My current batch of Transocean has a cost basis of about $58.50 and I've owned it since mid-July. After a late day surge, shares closed at $53.

Using that simple rule, I should have banished the shares, even after that promising surge in the final hour of trading.

I suppose that if I included the $0.79/share dividend, we'd be borderline.

Yet there they are. Still sitting there, with a nasty shade of red clearly indicating that its been a loser.

Before today's surge, I actually sold $52.50 calls expiring on Friday, for about $0.44 cents.

That seems like a pretty bad risk - reward, but as I looked at my history with Transocean going back to the most recent purchase in July, with the premium received today added to all of the other premiums, if assigned, I'll net a 0.7% profit.

Paltry, sure. But still a profit. Annualized, that's 2.8%, which is a lot better than the 1.6% S&P 500 deficit thus far this year.

Better yet, to compare apples to apples, during the peropd of ownership the S&P 500 has dropped from 1316 to Thursday's close of 1215, which happens to be a 7.6% loss.

I'll take 0.7% and forget about the annualization. Better yet, those particular shares are in a tax deferred account, so I have no concern about buying them back when they inevitably fall again, since the wash sales rule is moot.

In the past 6 weeks I've been up to New York twice to attend funerals and have had a chance to reflect a bit on the lives and memories of friends and family.

I also think about Bob fairly often, despite the fact that we only met a single time.

Strangely, I also end up thinking about Bernard Baruch, a man I'd never met and it's very unlikely that I ever will. I doubt that he believed in reincarnation and I'm not certain that he and I will end up in the same place when it's my time.

Thinking about what a different investing world it has become, with immediate access to information, bid-ask differences of a penny and significantly reduced transaction costs, I wonder what Bernard Baruch would teach us today?

In all likelihood, he would be going by the name "Barry Barch" and would be pushing whatever the intangible asset of the day happened to be.

In all likelihood, he'd be recommending sales of options on the NIX futures, which temselves are a measure of the implied neurotic tendancies of investors who are uncertain of what to do in the face of earning's season reports.

Bob, on the other hand, would probably not follow him in that direction.

In my humble opinion





Option to Profit is available as either an eBook or 300+ page paperback. Take a humorous look at a serious topic and learn how to make your portfolio finally go to work for you in bull and bear market environments.

More about the book and purchase options. Scroll down and read the Szelhamos Rules blog, updated every weekday.

Find  OTP Book at Amazon, B&N or now you can also Order direct  from publisher. See a sneak preview of Chapter 1. hoco blogs

Want to instantly download PDF file with full color charts and tables? Buy Now

 

 

  
Invest like TheAcsMan

Option to Profit is available as either an eBook or 300+ paperback. Take a humorous look at a serious topic and learn how to make your portfolio finally go to work for you in bull and bear market environments.

See a sneak preview of Chapter 1.  hoco blogs

More about the book and purchase options. Scroll down and read the Szelhamos Rules blog, updated every weekday.

Find  OTP Book at Amazon, B&N or now you can also Order direct  from publisher. Use 10% Discount Code P4S2ZD8H

 

  




Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Put a Condom on your Portfolio



Nobody ever got giddy over practicing caution.

The other day I was looking through a "new feature" being offered by E*Trade, their "Online Advisor". It''s not terribly different from the myriad of other such tools in that essentially the same questions are asked, particularly with regard to your tolerance for risk, the number of years until retirement and other seemingly important questions.

When it's all said and done, there's nothing more exciting than having "Fixed Income" recommended for your stage in life.

You know the stage. Respirators, catheters and orderlies that don't know how to use any of them.

Caution is pretty boring and I really don't want to be reminded that I'm at that stage of life.

I may be ready for Depends, but  I'll fight until the end to avoid those Fixed Income investments.

CondomsI had a friend in college who always thought that he was the desire of every woman's dreams. He used to proudly show me the condom that he kept in his wallet, as he always needed to carry "protection."

After a while, I recognized the crease in the foil of that condom and realized that for years he was showing off the very same one. he was taking the exercise of caution to an extreme that really wasn't terribly appealing, but he was behaving otherwise.

He had a business card that read something to this effect:

"My name is Harold. I want to sleep with you. If you want to do the same, please call my number. If not, please return the card, as I'm running low".

He also used to talk about how he was going to go to the "free clinic to get "tested." It seemed that he needed to be tested everyweek. Whenever I would hint that I might want to go with him to get tested, he would always come up with a reason why he wasn't able to go at that paricular time.

Somehow, I don't think he was quite as accomplished as he had been inferring. I don't think he really needed much protection, except perhaps from reality.

I made no such pretense and was never a big fan of "protection".

To be clear, I'm still talking about FIxed Income investments. I like protection in most other aspects of life.

Although I've never been a big fan of reckless behavior, especially when it comes to investments, I'm not a big believer in caution, either.

The problem is that when giddiness does set in, caution is thrown to the wind.

Certainly there has to be a graph somewhere that shows the association between alcohol and unwanted pregnancy, just as their has to be a graph someplace showing the association between a rapid rise in the stock market and stupid decisions.

Unless you were in FIxed Incomes or in cash, which are essentially the same, you've been very happy the past couple of weeks.

So happy, that you probably think that everything is just going to keep going unchecked in the same direction. One of these days, the "this time it's going to be different" feeling is going to come true, but that's not likely to happen this time or the next.

And then, along come days like today.

After a couple of weeks when grasping at rumors of good news was all that it took to drive the market higher, today was the day that Germany's pessimism on an EU solution came back to haunt.

Pissing in the wind, punching a whole in a condom and buying high are all wreckless behaviors. Pinning your hopes on a promise to resolve a crisis is probably not a good strategy.

But from my perspective, not having downside protection is every bit as wreckless, especially when the market goes up and down in completely unexpected spasms.

Sure, I was saddened to see Halliburton drop $3 after announcing earnings before Monday's opening, but the $38 call options that I sold on Friday for $1.02, that happen to expire this coming Friday soften the pain.

Of course, the downside is pointed out by those that believe that stocks are all poised to make spectacular climbs at any given moment in time.

There's no shortage of examples where that's happened.

This year, I can look back at shares of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters and VIsa among others, that I'd lost to assignment after unexpected run-ups.

Those are easy to remember and hard to forget.

But I'll also remember that last week I didn't bank any option income on my downbeaten shares of Mosaic because there were rumors of a buy-out and I didn't want to get caught flat-footed.

I've thought of alternatives to selling covered calls, but that would require picking better stocks and making their purchase and sale at just the right time.

That solution would require effort and skill, so that makes it a "no go". Although I'd be willing to use insider information to help arrive at the same end point, I don't appear to yet have those kind of connections.

The reality is that there are very few surprise break-outs of a stock's price. For every Visa that gaps from $80 to $90, or very Green Mountain that goes form $45 to $60, there are a couple of thousand each day that don't.

Today, El Paso did, but space doesn't allow me the opportunity to list those that didn't.

The fear of missing out on one of those great moves is unfounded. They just don't happen that often.

What does happen often is that stocks go up, they go down and they go up again, right before going down and then up again.

After that has all happened, you can reliably predict that cycle will repeat itself.

On Monday, I started the day with cash coming from the assignment of British Petroleim, Freeport McMoRan and Alcoa and was looking for a quick bang for my investment buck. For the day, at least, I got it by picking up additional shares of Riverbed Technology, DuPont, Sallie Mae and ProShares UltraShort Silver ETF.

I immediately sold in the money calls on all three of those purchases. After all, when do you put protection on? After the proverbial horse has left the barn?

For my trouble of selling near the money and in the money calls expiring on this Friday, if assigned, I'll net a 3.4% return on the options income alone

Sometimes the protection is worth more than the asset it's protecting.

I'm not exactly certain how that same analogy can be applied to condoms, but at least in my world of investing, it seems to be true.

For the shares that I picked up today, I don't have very many high hopes of an El Paso like surge.

Whatever surge there may be will be restrained by the protection, but enjoyable nonetheless.

As the markets have been evolving I'm looking forward to even more variety in the protection available.

As we begin selling derivatives on derivatives, such as options on the VIX or short options on the VIX, I'm looking forward to the inevitable appearance of some of those UltraSheer options to help make the experience that much more enjoyable.

And what investor wouldn't want to be long in UltraSheers? 



Hop SIng and Paw Blaze a New PathAmerican Tower ChartMake you Portfolio Work for You!

Invest like TheAcsMan

Option to Profit is available as either an eBook or 300+ paperback. Take a humorous look at a serious topic and learn how to make your portfolio finally go to work for you in bull and bear market environments.

See a sneak preview of Chapter 1.  hoco blogs

More about the book and purchase options. Scroll down and read the Szelhamos Rules blog, updated every weekday.

Find  OTP Book at Amazon, B&N or now you can also Order direct  from publisher. Use 10% Discount Code P4S2ZD8H

 

  




Monday, October 10, 2011

Really, the Recession is Over?

HEADER

What's in the Szelhamos Portfolio?








Hop SIng and Paw Blaze a New PathAmerican Tower ChartMake you Portfolio Work for You!

Invest like TheAcsMan

Option to Profit is available as either an eBook or 300+ paperback. Take a humorous look at a serious topic and learn how to make your portfolio finally go to work for you in bull and bear market environments.

See a sneak preview of Chapter 1.  hoco blogs

More about the book and purchase options. Scroll down and read the Szelhamos Rules blog, updated every weekday.

Find  OTP Book at Amazon, B&N or now you can also Order direct  from publisher. Use 10% Discount Code P4S2ZD8H

 

  




Saturday, October 8, 2011

Show me the Numbers

What's in the Szelhamos Portfolio?



Other than  my family the two things that I love most are numbers and comedy.

I like fried food, too, but now I'm not allowed to eat them, because my numbers are too high.

Sort of ironic. Those numbers I hate.

With so much debate going on about the concentration of wealth in our nation and the unfairness of the tax code, I'm somewhat perplexed that the beautiful objectivity of numbers could be so bastardized.

Living near Washington, DC, I truly understand the beauty of "spin", but how do you spin a number itself?

Whereas many accept the Bible as the ultimate truth, believing the same about numbers doesn't violate the first commandment and isn't really counter to our western belief in monotheism.

Abbott and CostelloThere's probably no valid reason for me, however, to have such faith in the sanctity of numbers. I should be cynical based on an old Abbott and Costello routine from a few generations ago.

Costello clearly demonstrated that 13 times 7 equalled 28. He also proved that 28 divided by 7 equalled 13.

And for the perfect trifecta 13+13+13+13+13+13+13 = 28

The Gospel of Comedy may trump all other truths.

These days, the numbers are sliced and diced by all sides to demonstrate points about inequities.

Amazing how one side feels that the disenfranchised are being unduly carrying a tax burden, while the other side believes that the disenfranchised are represented by thise people that would be effected by the "Buffett Rule".

"50% of Americans don't pay taxes"

"The top 1% of earners carry a greater tax burden than ever before"

Both of those sound patently unfair. And there's no shortage of other factoids being tossed around. Refute one and you'll be answered with another factoid. Refute that, and so on.

It was 1982 and I was very fortunate when I first started investing, in that the market was beginning to wake uo from a long slumber. Although after what had been referred to as this generation's "lost decade" in investing, I guess the best investment would have been a 30 year Treasury at 17% back in the late 70's, or those great MAC bonds that helped rescue New York CIty after Gerald Ford seemed disinclined to help.

See, that's the beauty of words.

Ford was portrayed as having told New York to "Go to Hell" in the city's newspapers. That's spin.

To borrow and butcher Tom Hanks' line from a Leagiue of their Own", "There's no spinning in numbers."

By the way, there is one other thing that I love, although it's more of an addiction.

I love anagrams.

Back in 1982 the concept of trickle down economics was widely introduced by Ronald Reagan. You know him, he's the guy that both sides embrace with a big, wet hug.

The concept sounded great. After all, the wealthy were the benefactors of society. Of course they would take their increased wealth and shower it down upon the masses.

Well, my love of anagrams always led me to the words "age, rage and anger", whenever I looked at the word "Reagan".

Of course that just reflects a person who at the time was still young enough to not fall under an earlier generation's warning to not trust anyone over 30.

There I was in Public Health School, learning all about maldistribution iand inequities, yet I was also a investment class wannabe with a growing fascination with the stock market.

What nmazes me is that no one has decided to look at the supposed inequity in a systematic way, by looking at changes at the margins, let's say, compared to 1980, which ended by ushering in the Reagan era.

My guess is that it actually has already been done, but that without a sexy sound bite, good luck getting popular traction.

Funny thing, but it has already been done by the Congressional Business Office. The non-partisan CBO.

Back in 1980, the top 1% of the population received 9.8% of all income. By 2005, it was up to 18.1% or an 85% increase.

But when it comes to tax paid, the top 1%, and that included me, rose from 15.4 to 27.6%, or a rise of 79%.

In otre words, the same tax code that allows most senior citizens on social security to not pay federal income taxes has also significantly trickled up benefits to that top 1%. They made much more money, yet paid much less taxes.

Of course, then the next debate falls to the source of those earnings, specifically capital gains versus earned income.

I also love charity.

But in my case, it's donating to charity. In that regard, I really have a hard time understanding why the $100 that I donate only really costs me about $60 after considering tax deductions, while Warren Buffet's secretary ends up being charged $85 for that same contribution.

But that's another blog.

In the meantime, the numbers treated me well last week, as it hopefully did for most others.

In addition to the nice paper gains, again I sold a number of call options during the last 48 hours.

In fact, I sold such weekly options on 22% of my portfolio and received an additional 0.68% return in premiums on that portion of the portfolio.

I'll be losing some of my Halliburton and Freeport McMoRan shares, but may find myself buying them right back, if the price is right.

In that case, the numbers are truly subject to interpretation. Some of those Freeport shares were assigned, resulting in a capital loss on shares.

So it's off to Quicken to see whether there's any value in taking a tax loss on those shares or just buying them back within that 30 day period and forgoing the loss in an effort to create new options income and maybe capital gains.

Sigh. Rich people's problems.



Hop SIng and Paw Blaze a New PathAmerican Tower ChartMake you Portfolio Work for You!

Invest like TheAcsMan

Option to Profit is available as either an eBook or 300+ paperback. Take a humorous look at a serious topic and learn how to make your portfolio finally go to work for you in bull and bear market environments.

See a sneak preview of Chapter 1.  hoco blogs

More about the book and purchase options. Scroll down and read the Szelhamos Rules blog, updated every weekday.

Find  OTP Book at Amazon, B&N or now you can also Order direct  from publisher. Use 10% Discount Code P4S2ZD8H